|
NewMarket Corp. --
The
New Ethyl
Company
finds competing in the fuel
additives business is still a whale
of a job.
by
John
Reid Blackwell
There's
nothing like tough times to sharpen a business team.
That's
how Thomas E. "Ted" Gottwald, chief executive officer of NewMarket
Corp., described the company's moxie at its annual shareholders' meeting in
April.
A
few years ago, things were indeed tough for NewMarket, one of the Richmond
area's most iconic companies. The company, which for decades was named Ethyl
Corp., makes petroleum additives that are used in engines and fuels all over the
world. Though those products are essential, the company's markets and
performance were difficult enough in 2001 for the previous CEO, Bruce C.
Gottwald, to stand before shareholders and bluntly proclaim it "a sorry
year."
|
 |
Warren
Huang, president of Afton Chemical Corp. stands near a display in company
headquarters. JOE MAHONEY/
TIMES-DISPATCH
|
Shareholder
meetings seem to have become gradually cheerier in the years since. Challenges
still lie ahead, but NewMarket has made a turnaround from the days when the
company seemed to be in a deep hole.
"The
tight spot that we got into -- I was part of the decision-making that put us
there," said Teddy Gottwald, 45, during an interview at the company's
Colonial-style headquarters in downtown Richmond. When he succeeded his father
as CEO in 2001, "I didn't feel I had anything to prove," he said.
"But I felt I had a responsibility to our shareholders and employees to
improve performance."
When
Gottwald took the helm, changes in the petroleum industry had hit the company
hard. Prices were falling and profit margins were narrowing. The additives
industry had an overcapacity of production. The company's sales were dropping.
And NewMarket was carrying nearly $350 million in debt, much of it the result of
a stock buy-back program. (Its debt had exceeded $600 million in the late
1990s). By 2001, NewMarket's stock price had fallen into the low single digits,
and the company had suspended its dividend and was cutting staff.
Today,
NewMarket's results are on the upswing. Revenue surpassed $1 billion in 2005
for the first time since 1997 and has increased every year since 2002, when it
was $656 million. Profit was $42 million in 2005, up from $9.9 million in 2002.
The company has slashed its debt to less than $154 million and started to build
up cash reserves for possible acquisitions. It reinstated its dividend at 12.5
cents per share in the first quarter. The company's shares closed at $43.09
Friday [June 9, 2006) on the New York Stock Exchange. In 2001, its stock was below $5 per share
and for a while dropped below $1 per share.
Gottwald
said the turnaround was the result of five years of hard work. He attributes it
to an experienced business team further sharpened by the tough times. Its sales
of engine oils have improved, and the company has built sales in other petroleum
additives such as hydraulic and transmission fluids.
Yet,
Gottwald also says, NewMarket's foundation was always solid. "I'm convinced
we were never as bad off as some people thought we were," he said.
"Our cash flow has been strong throughout this period."
The
average consumer doesn't buy or see NewMarket's products directly, but they do
have an impact on daily life. Automobile engines and other machinery need to be
lubricated to function properly, and oil companies turn to manufacturers such as
NewMarket for chemical additives that make those fluids work more effectively,
reducing friction, heat and wear and tear on machinery.
Automobile
manufacturers and oil companies also turn to additives companies for chemicals
that improve the efficiency and cleanliness of fuel. NewMarket's products make
it easier to start car engines, improve fuel efficiency and help reduce
pollution. Demand for those products is often driven by government regulations.
NewMarket's
competitors include Ohio-based Lubrizol Corp., the largest company in the
industry; Infineum International Limited Co., a joint venture of ExxonMobil
Chemical Co. and Shell Chemicals; and Chevron Oronite Co.
The
company's improving performance has come through "a lot of little things
that added up," said David Fiorenza, its vice president, treasurer and
chief financial officer. Those include debt reduction and cuts in excess
manufacturing capacity.
Industry
conditions have also changed. "I suppose the dominant factor in our
industry in the late '90s was the consolidation of oil companies," Gottwald
said. "That put the power in the hands of some very large companies. We
went through a good five years where prices for our products went down."
After
a few years of cutbacks in production capacity and improving global demand,
supply is more in line with demand in the additives industry.
"Some
of the large companies that were 90 percent focused on price are now concerned
about supply," Gottwald said.
The
company also shifted its emphasis toward more high-value petroleum additive
products such as transmission, gear and hydraulic fluids, rather than engine
oils, a high-volume but low-margin part of its business, though engine oil sales
have improved, too.
"Shifting
R&D investment into more high-margin, high-growth areas was a key to our
success," said C.S. Warren Huang, president of Afton Chemical Corp., the
subsidiary that manages the company's core business in petroleum additives.
Huang, a native of Taiwan and a 26-year veteran of the company, is part of the
sharpened team on whom Gottwald relies.
Huang,
who has held a number of jobs in the company, works out of the company's
research and development center on Spring Street, where engineers and scientists
develop and test new generations of chemical additives for customers.
It's
an expensive process. The upper floors of the R&D center have the look of a
biotech center, where scientists develop chemical additives and test their
molecular properties.
On
the lower floor, in a series of bays and windowed rooms, engineers and mechanics
work with engines in various states of assembly. Several rooms hold engines that
run for hours or days to test the effectiveness of certain additives in fuel or
lubricants. The longest test runs an engine for 500 hours and uses about 11,000
gallons of fuel.
"Consumers
can be sure that our products go through stringent testing," Huang said.
About 50 percent of the company's product portfolio has been brought to market
in the last three years.
Huang
said the company has seen several trends in the past five years that have helped
with its turnaround, one being a new organizational structure that helped make
it more nimble. "Now, more decisions are made at the local level," he
said.
In
2004, the company changed its corporate structure to a holding company, which
executives said would make it easier to manage its product lines and seek
acquisitions. It adopted the NewMarket name and changed its ticker symbol from
EY to NEU. NewMarket became the parent company of two subsidiaries: Ethyl Corp.,
which manages the company's declining tetraethyl lead business, and Afton
[Chemical Corp.],
which manages its core business in petroleum additives.
Along
with the new management structure, the company is putting more emphasis on
international markets. In recent years it has opened small sales offices in
China, India, Mexico, Venezuela and other countries. Historically, its sales
have been focused in North America and Europe. Gottwald attributes the company's
improving performance in part to a generally healthy global economy and rising
demand for petroleum products in developing countries.
"We
decided we needed to focus on the emerging markets where we were
underrepresented," Huang said. "We really increased our sales forces
in emerging markets, and as a result we have a better business there, and we are
growing."
Even
with the new name, the company held onto a symbol of its past. The NewMarket
corporate logo includes the image of a whale, a reference to a 1962 event that
made the company famous and enshrined it in local business lore. Ethyl Corp. was
not always a Richmond company. It was created by General Motors Corp. and
Standard Oil Corp. in 1923 to sell tetraethyl lead, an anti-knock fuel additive
that allowed car engines to run more efficiently.
The
company came to Richmond because of Teddy Gottwald's grandfather, Floyd D.
Gottwald Sr., who had risen from mail clerk to president of Albemarle Paper
Manufacturing Co. In 1962, Albemarle acquired Ethyl Corp. in a $200 million
leveraged buyout that the financial press dubbed "Jonah swallows the
whale." Hence the whale in the NewMarket logo.
Over
the years, Ethyl Corp. grew and sprouted a number of other businesses, including
the specialty chemicals manufacturer Albemarle Corp., the plastics and aluminum
extrusions maker Tredegar Corp., and the insurance company First Colony Corp.
Ethyl Corp.'s old bread-and-butter product, tetraethyl lead, has been in a
long-term decline since leaded gasoline went out of favor in the 1970s. It is
now used only in niche markets in the United States, Canada and Europe, and it
is being phased-out around the world. The tetraethyl lead business will continue
to erode, and the company is managing that decline and drawing as much cash out
of the business as possible.
NewMarket
still faces other challenges. In petroleum additives, a $7 billion industry,
NewMarket is the smallest of four major players that control 80 percent of the
market. Petroleum additives remains a slow-growth market, at about 1 percent a
year. Profit margins are still tight, though improving, and rising oil and raw
materials prices continue to squeeze NewMarket and its competitors.
Considering
the market situation, NewMarket's next step may be to buy a smaller competitor,
or perhaps even a larger one. NewMarket's improving financial situation will
make that easier. Gottwald says the company is looking for potential
acquisitions, but he stresses that patience is the key.
"I
don't expect to have any news for you anytime soon," he told shareholders
at the annual meeting. In the meantime, "we're going to continue to work
hard, and do our best to keep the momentum going."
-- November 16, 2006
This article was
published originally in the June 12, 2006, edition of the Richmond
Times-Dispatch. It is republished here with permission.
|